<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Structured Blogging is Happening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blame.ca/?feed=rss2&#038;p=79" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79</link>
	<description>Loonie ramblings from the Great White North ...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jherd</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1559</link>
		<dc:creator>jherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1559</guid>
		<description>It intersring and very excyting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It intersring and very excyting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree laziness is the wrong answer to the wrong question. are flickr users lazy? delicious users? technorati users? heck no. people are increasingly tuned into declarative living, and that means metadata creation by the back door. if it were canonical that might be an issue, but structured blogging is going to be major, imho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree laziness is the wrong answer to the wrong question. are flickr users lazy? delicious users? technorati users? heck no. people are increasingly tuned into declarative living, and that means metadata creation by the back door. if it were canonical that might be an issue, but structured blogging is going to be major, imho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>Email us! Email me! dick at sxip dot com ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email us! Email me! dick at sxip dot com &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: interpnexus</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>interpnexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 22:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>I would like to communicate with Sxip and Sxore people re partnership oppts, how do I do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to communicate with Sxip and Sxore people re partnership oppts, how do I do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Frank</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 05:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1551</guid>
		<description>i agree that writing off structured blogging because people are lazy doesn't seem legit. people do already put a bit of thought into adding semantics to their posts, even if it's only to get a good spot on technorati or something like that. tagging is goofy and flawed like meta-keywords used to be... any initiative to make the content on the internet better structured in a way that can be consumed by automated systems is a good idea in my opinion. all it needs is support, and it looks like this structured blogging thing may in fact fly...it'll be a good thing, another step in the right direction, but not the end all beat all by any means...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree that writing off structured blogging because people are lazy doesn&#8217;t seem legit. people do already put a bit of thought into adding semantics to their posts, even if it&#8217;s only to get a good spot on technorati or something like that. tagging is goofy and flawed like meta-keywords used to be&#8230; any initiative to make the content on the internet better structured in a way that can be consumed by automated systems is a good idea in my opinion. all it needs is support, and it looks like this structured blogging thing may in fact fly&#8230;it&#8217;ll be a good thing, another step in the right direction, but not the end all beat all by any means&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>  Sat Dec 31, 2005 at 2:18 PM  Structured blogging  Belated congratulations to the Structured Blogging folks on their announcement this month and all the buzz. I think this is...  http://www.r21online.com/archives/000698.html   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sat Dec 31, 2005 at 2:18 PM  Structured blogging  Belated congratulations to the Structured Blogging folks on their announcement this month and all the buzz. I think this is&#8230;  <a href="http://www.r21online.com/archives/000698.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.r21online.com/archives/000698.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus Spathis</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus Spathis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>Great post Dick and thanks for the support of structured blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Dick and thanks for the support of structured blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyC</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>Paul is right, people are lazy, which is why some version of structured blogging is most likely. 
 
 Most web content is accessed via searching. People will focus on the first few results, which would promote structured content over its lesser bretheren. People, who are by definition lazy, would demand structure to minimize the search effort. 
 
 Bloggers are people and, as we have determined, are lazy. But they are blogging, which one assumes points to them being slightly less lazy than other people. Their content is there to be found and read. Adding structure that will elevate it to the attention of the interested masses seems like little extra effort in comparision to maintaining a blog. This lesser effort is needed to that ensure the greater enterprise isn't wasted. 
 
 And isn't laziness all about the minimization of effort?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul is right, people are lazy, which is why some version of structured blogging is most likely. </p>
<p> Most web content is accessed via searching. People will focus on the first few results, which would promote structured content over its lesser bretheren. People, who are by definition lazy, would demand structure to minimize the search effort. </p>
<p> Bloggers are people and, as we have determined, are lazy. But they are blogging, which one assumes points to them being slightly less lazy than other people. Their content is there to be found and read. Adding structure that will elevate it to the attention of the interested masses seems like little extra effort in comparision to maintaining a blog. This lesser effort is needed to that ensure the greater enterprise isn&#8217;t wasted. </p>
<p> And isn&#8217;t laziness all about the minimization of effort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blame.ca/?p=79#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blame.ca/dick/?p=79#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>  Sun Dec 18, 2005 at 5:11 PM    infrastructure« Lazyness, messiness and structureDick Hardt refutes Paul KedrovskyHere’s what Dick Hardt had to say to Paul K:My buddy Paul Kedrosky recently wrote that Structured Blogging Will  ...   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun Dec 18, 2005 at 5:11 PM    infrastructure« Lazyness, messiness and structureDick Hardt refutes Paul KedrovskyHere’s what Dick Hardt had to say to Paul K:My buddy Paul Kedrosky recently wrote that Structured Blogging Will  &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
